0
0
The moment of final farewell may be the most delicate intersection of human emotion and biological reality. For centuries, across nearly every culture and faith, kissing a deceased loved one or holding their hand one last time has been considered a sacred rite. It is the ultimate gesture of closure—a physical confirmation of a bond that transcends life itself.
However, a recent medical warning that went viral has sparked a global debate, forcing many to weigh the deep needs of the grieving heart against the pragmatic demands of public health.
The discussion intensified after Dr. Viktor Ivanovik, a physician from Moldova with a large social media following, issued a serious caution regarding physical contact with the deceased. His message was clear: although a person has passed away, the biological environment of the body remains active and, in certain cases, potentially hazardous.
Dr. Ivanovik explained that if a person died from a severe infection or a highly contagious disease, the pathogens responsible do not simply disappear at the moment of death. In the hours that follow, bacteria and viruses can persist on the skin and mucous membranes, posing a rare but scientifically documented risk to those who come into close physical contact.
Reactions to this warning were swift and deeply divided. On one side are advocates of medical caution, who argue that safety should never be compromised—even in moments of profound grief. From their perspective, the medical community has an ethical responsibility to inform the public about what is known as the “post-mortem microbiome.”
When the body ceases metabolic function, the immune system—the primary defense against pathogens—no longer operates. This allows microorganisms to multiply rapidly. If the cause of death was sepsis, meningitis, or a serious gastrointestinal infection, the concentration of harmful microbes may be significant. To these proponents, kissing the forehead or hand of the deceased represents an unnecessary health risk that could even turn a funeral into a source of secondary infection.
On the other side are those who view this medical warning as a cold, clinical intrusion into one of the most intimate human experiences. For many, death rituals are essential to processing loss. In Eastern Orthodox, Catholic, and many traditional cultures, the “last kiss” is not merely symbolic—it is deeply spiritual. It represents a final expression of love and acknowledgment of physical presence before burial.
To suggest that this act is “dangerous” feels, to some, like a violation of a sacred moment. They argue that the emotional and psychological trauma of being denied a final touch may be far more damaging than the minimal risk of infection.
This tension between grief and caution became especially visible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health authorities imposed strict rules that prevented families from touching, kissing, or even being present with deceased relatives. While these measures saved lives, they also left thousands with unresolved grief, unable to perform traditional farewell rituals.
From a purely clinical standpoint, the risk associated with kissing a deceased loved one depends heavily on the cause of death and the time elapsed. If the body has been professionally prepared by funeral staff, biological risks are greatly reduced through sanitation and embalming. However, in the immediate hours following death—before professional handling—the risk is at its highest.
Medical experts note that certain pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus or intestinal bacteria, can remain viable for a limited time. Additionally, if the deceased carried a bloodborne or respiratory infection, the skin may temporarily harbor infectious agents.
Navigating this “farewell dilemma” requires a balanced approach that respects both science and tradition. Many grief counselors and progressive medical professionals advocate for a “mindful farewell.” This involves consulting medical or funeral professionals about specific risks and, if necessary, choosing symbolic alternatives—such as touching the hand instead of the face, or using a cloth as a barrier.
Ultimately, the act of kissing the deceased speaks to the depth of human attachment. It is a gesture that challenges the clinical reality of death in favor of the emotional truth of love. Warnings from doctors like Dr. Ivanovik are not meant to erase tradition, but to illuminate biological facts.
Humans are creatures who heal through touch, and in the presence of death, that need becomes even more powerful.
The goal moving forward is not to abandon sacred customs out of fear, but to empower people with knowledge so they can practice them safely. Awareness of hygiene does not strip a moment of its meaning. A final kiss can remain a profound act of love—even when performed with an understanding of both life and the microscopic life that briefly remains.
The heart seeks closure. The body seeks protection. Finding harmony between the two is the true challenge of mourning in the modern age. When science is acknowledged without dismissing the soul, our final goodbyes can remain both safe and deeply meaningful.
